Give me your opinions on how I should be looking at Law School admissions.
Since most of the reasons I want to go to law school are centered on things we debate here, I figure this is as good as place as any to solicit input - better than co-workers from my “other” life. I will, of course, be having this conversation with my wife and family, but I want to hear what you all think.
I had my first conversation today with a Law School admissions consultant from Kaplan. I decided to pony up the money for this service because I’m sufficiently outside the standard demographics of law school applicants that I really want insights on how to structure my personal statement/essays, resume, etc to capture the admissions folks and make it clear why they want to look at my stuff.
In the process, we discussed a hard-core truth. The admissions process is overly heavily weighted towards basic statistics of undergraduate GPA and LSAT score (generally accounting for 2/3 of the admissions decision), with the “other stuff” being considered only once someone has made the cut of the quantitative data. The bottom line is that my scores won’t even likely get me past the first cut at some of the schools I’ve picked out (something I knew going in), and only one of the schools on my list shows a better than 50/50 chance, based on 2008 admissions statistics. Harsh, but true.
I find this incredibly aggravating. I mean, I understand it - these folk get tons and tons of applications, and they have to apply some sort of quantitative filter to have any hope of doing their jobs. But it’s really going to screw me.
I did a 5-year joint BS/MS program as an undergrad (i.e. I got both degrees on the same day, at the end of my 5th year, taking a mix of undergrad and grad courses for my 4th & 5th years). The LSAC paperwork only counts the first four years of GPA. And doesn’t count my MBA from a few years ago at all, except to note it on the paperwork and tack on a copy of the transcript. I had a 3.65 GPA through 5 year of my BS/MS, but the 4-year total was 3.60. Even more aggravating, they won’t even likely look at the fact that I did my MBA at a top 20 business school and maintained a 4.0 GPA while working full time.
My LSAT score was good - 163 (on a 120-180 scale, 89th percentile). Not stellar, but pretty damned good. And given my scores from practice tests (which were LSATs from earlier years), it’s representative - I could maybe get another point or two if I took it again, but I’m not going to break 170 (which would get me in almost anywhere). With a GPA that took all of my academics into account, it would get me into all but the really top-end schools (e.g. Georgetown). As I said - aggravating as hell.
My consultant’s advice is to pick a couple more “safe” schools to apply to, in case I don’t get into the schools I really want to get into. I’ve spent some time this afternoon looking around for other schools to put on the list, and not finding anything (I could get into Catholic University pretty easily by these metrics, but their views on Church/State separation and mine are, well, “not in sync” is the most polite way to say it).
Right now my thought process is leaning towards “screw it”. If I can’t get into a law school with a program that fits me, then I’ll look for some other way to advance my career. I’m not doing this because I want to be a lawyer, per se. I’m becoming a lawyer because there are certain things I want to do.
Please give me your thoughts.
P.S. I’m going to William & Mary Law on the 19th, spending a full day with a tour, a class visit, a meeting with the Dean of Admissions, and meetings with the directors of the two clinics they have that so appeal to me (the Bill of Rights clinic and the Technology and the Courts clinic). They are head and shoulders my top choice right now, because of how their program seems to fit both where I’m coming from and where I’m going, so this should be a real reality check.
Personal
Regarding things that shouldn't be any of your business but we're telling you anyway.