Screwing With People

Regarding practical jokes and blog warfare against those who obviously have it coming.

Fred Phelps Has Competition

Fred Phelps is kind of a single-issue hate monger. He needs to diversify

People are creeping in on Westboro Baptist Church’s territory. He really needs to diversify before these guys eat his lunch:

Shrimp, crab, lobster, clams, mussels, all these are an abomination before the Lord, just as gays are an abomination. Why stop at protesting gay marriage? Bring all of God’s law unto the heathens and the sodomites. We call upon all Christians to join the crusade against Long John Silver’s and Red Lobster. Yea, even Popeye’s shall be cleansed. The name of Bubba shall be anathema. We must stop the unbelievers from destroying the sanctity of our restaurants.

image


image

No, Chief Justice Roberts Is Not Resigning

Above The Law appears to have found out where this rumor came from.

Oh, this is precious. From Above The Law:

Like many a promising legal career, the Roberts resignation rumor traces its origins to a 1L class at Georgetown University Law Center….

Here’s an account of what went down in Professor Peter Tague’s criminal law class this morning, from a 1L at Georgetown Law:

Today’s class was partially on the validity of informants not explaining their sources. [Professor Tague] started off class at around 9 am EST by telling us not to tell anyone, but that we might find it interesting that tomorrow, Roberts would be announcing his retirement for health concerns. He refused to tell anyone how he knew. Then, at around 9:30, he let everyone in on the joke.

Note the timestamps on the Radar posts. The first one came out at 6:10 a.m., i.e., the Pacific Time equivalent of 9:10 a.m. Eastern time. The retraction came out at 6:36 a.m., i.e., the Pacific Time equivalent of 9:36 a.m. Eastern — shortly after Professor Tague let his class in on the joke.

The Twitter generation - the new face of journalism?

The ATL post has more sources that confirm this sequence of events.

H/T: The Volokh Conspiracy

Prank Of The Day

A daily lesson in how to screw with people

H/T: One of my Facebook friends.

Credit Card Security

Sometimes it’s good when Big Brother is watching out for you…

Since we’ve had no income, as part of our controlling discretionary spending, all of our annual renewals for various charitable/political/whatever organizations had been stacking up on my desk. Now that mrs. dwex has a job (well, will in 2 weeks), I went through the stack to send in my annual donations. After doing five of them, on the sixth one, my credit card was declined. After verifying that I’d entered my credit card info correctly, I guessed that all of these identically-priced transactions in very rapid sequence had set off an alarm at the credit card company. So I called them up and went through their voice prompt system (credit card number, social security number, password, etc). They immediately launched into an inquiry requiring me to indicate whether I recognized a handful of transactions. I indicated that I did, they removed the hold, and then back to submitting contributions.

All without having to interact with a human being for any of it.

God, I love technology smile

BTW - most credit card companies allow you to choose a password to use in place of “mother’s maiden name”. If you haven’t done so, I suggest that you do it. I did this five years ago or so after someone social-engineered the credit card company into changing the billing and email address associated with my account (which I found after having my credit card declined for some purchase or another and called them to complain).

Greatest RickRoll Ever?

This gets two thumbs up for originality.

Flying The Miserable Skies

What the TSA (Tough Shit Asshole) is doing to keep us safe

Having already booked two trips this summer, one international and one domestic, I am really looking forward to getting there 4 hours early just to get groped by sweaty minimum wagers too stupid to know when to remove the fry cooker from the grease (Hint: its when that loud buzzer goes off). Alright. I’m not being fair, I admit, half these people could score a greeting job at Walmart, or stock shelves at Home Depot, even without the forklift training.

And since I am about as lilly white as they come, ditto family in tow, I can expect some tag teaming that would make Roddy Piper and Hulk Hogan jealous. I will be sporting my “I give it up for TSA workers” underwear so that my full body scans will be enjoyable.

It’s times like these that I wish Texas (with all the accouterments that goes with it) incorporated an airlines. Texas Air, where everyone is packing, and if you even look Arab, there will be several dozen pairs of eyeballls on you non stop, so tear open that bag of peanuts very slowly.

H/T: reason.tv

Glenn Beck Dishes It Out But Can’t Take It?

Glenn Beck has sent his attorneys after a web site that parodies his handling of the “birther” nonsense via a rehashed Internet meme.

Seems like Glenn Beck can dish it out but not take it:

...he reportedly is continuing with legal action against a site that, some feel, rather parodies Beck’s own inimitably ineffable style.

It seems that the genesis of the site was a roast of the comedian Bob Saget. In it, fellow comedian Gilbert Gottfried suggests that Saget eliminated another human being in an inordinately unpleasant manner sometime around 1990.

This was funny because it was not true. And its funniness spread to the forums of Fark, where it was attached to the alleged insinuations of Glenn Beck.

Then, in early September, a chap called Isaac Eiland-Hall decided to create a site that essentially repeated this joke in its URL and continued to make Beck the object of the joke.

I’d never heard of this meme, but whatever. The site is GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com:

This site exists to try and help examine the vicious rumour that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990. We don’t claim to know the truth—only that the rumour floating around saying that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990 should be discussed. So we’re going to do our part to try and help get to the bottom of this.

Why won’t Glenn Beck deny these allegations? We’re not accusing Glenn Beck of raping and murdering a young girl in 1990 - in fact, we think he didn’t! But we can’t help but wonder, since he has failed to deny these horrible allegations. Why won’t he deny that he raped and killed a young girl in 1990?

Glenn Beck’s attorneys have been going after this site, so far, via the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which, among other things, oversees domain name issues (e.g. cybersquatting). This guy’s attorneys had some interesting responses:

There is no indication that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to confuse anyone searching for Mr. Beck’s own website, nor that anyone was unintentionally confused – even initially. Only an abject imbecile could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the Complainant.

We are not here because the domain name could cause confusion. We do not have a declaration from the president of the international association of imbeciles that his members are blankly staring at the Respondent’s website wondering “where did all the race baiting content go?” We are here because Mr. Beck wants Respondent’s website shut down. He wants it shut down because Respondent’s website makes a poignant and accurate satirical critique of Mr. Beck by parodying Beck’s very rhetorical style. Beck’s skin is too thin to take the criticism, so he wants the site down. Beck is represented by a learned and respected legal team. Accordingly, it is beyond doubt that his counsel advised him that under the First Amendment to the United States’ Constitution, no action in a U.S. Court would be successful. See, e.g., Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988). Accordingly, Beck is attempting to use this transnational body to circumvent and subvert the Respondent’s constitutional rights.

(from pages 3-4 of the response brief (PDF file))

I dunno. I think the site is a pretty damned good parody of Glenn Beck’s handling of the birthers and other issues, and him using this tactic to try to silence a critic is a big sloppy helping of delicious irony.

Update: I guess I should point out, in case it wasn’t clear, that WIPO is an agency of the United Nations. Glenn Beck turning to the UN for help against a web site he doesn’t like? It is just too funny.

Sometimes There’s A Rarely Used But Good Law

Apparently “stolen valor” is a felony. Never knew that.

Well, has anyone ever heard of this before?

Richard Strandlof said he survived the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon. He said he survived again when a roadside bomb went off in Iraq, killing four fellow Marines. He’d point to his head and tell people he had a metal plate, collateral damage from the explosion.

None of it was true. On Friday, the FBI arrested him on the rare charge of “stolen valor.”

Strandlof, 32, was held “for false claims about receipt of military decorations or medals,” an FBI news release said. Charges had been filed in Denver, Colorado, the week before, the bureau said.

“The penalty for his crime is up to one year incarceration and a $100,000 fine,” it said.

Good. Lock his ass up:

He said he’s not sure exactly how he’s hurt people. “It’s not for me to say, and time will tell,” he said.

Hal Bidlack, a former Air Force lieutenant colonel, is one of those people. He ran for Congress as a Democrat and had Strandlof appear with him. Bidlack—who lost to incumbent Republican Doug Lamborn—isn’t too happy.

“Once one lie fell apart, the whole series of things ... just cascaded into an ocean of lies,” he said.

Bidlack was at the Pentagon when it came under attack on September 11, 2001. He now realizes that Strandlof stole portions of his own story.

“Now that we know he’s a lying fraud,” Bidlack said, “I think he was just parroting my own story back to me.”

Somehow I think this guy is in for a whole lot of ass-kicking before all is said and done.

Facebook Punks TechCrunch

Facebook creates a special feature just for the folks at TechCrunch - to see if they’ll blog about it without calling for confirmation.

Yesterday, TechCrunch posted an article titled Facebook Now Lets You Fax Your Photos. I Have No Idea Why Anyone Would Want To Do This:

Wow, talk about a big day for Facebook. Hours after launching Facebook Lite, open-sourcing part of FriendFeed’s code, and launching @ tagging, the site has one more release in store for today: Fax This Photo, powered by efax.com. Now when you’re looking through photo albums, you’ll have the opportunity to send a photo you like to a friend’s fax machine. For price of $1.50 per photo. That’s one pricey fax.

They even tested it out - it really worked.

Except it turns out that the good folk at TechCrunch were completely and utterly punk’d by Facebook:

So we’ve had our fun with Facebook over the years (Why We’re Suing Facebook For $25 Million In Statutory Damages, Republican PR Director Calls Facebook’s Randi Zuckerberg “totally full of sh*t”, Randi Threatens a Bar Bouncer). But in general these things are supposed to flow one way – we mess with them, they take it gracefully.

Today that changed. They punk’d us, and we fell for it. Hard.

Read the article. It’s hilarious. The fact that Facebook actually implemented the fax send (i.e. it wasn’t just some web stuff) shows the lengths they went to. TechCrunch can sometimes be rather controversial as “journalists” (e.g. they published a range of highly sensitive documents that had been stolen from Twitter). That Facebook went this far is both disturbing and funny.

A Night In The Life Of

How about a story?  I’ll even try to make it entertaining.

I’ve mentioned a couple of times that economic hardships have driven me to take part-time work as an armed security guard at hip-hop nightclub events.  For the most part, I try to avoid telling about what happens, partly because I don’t want to inadvertently discuss something that may become a legal matter and partly because I worry that it would be disloyal to my employer.  I want to go ahead and break that temporarily for two reasons:

1. An major national news event happened this week in which private security played a role; both as victim and heroes.  I thought you guys might be interested in a story about security guards that doesn’t involve chasing kids around the food court by Macy’s.

2. It was all so fucking off the chain that I simply have to get it off my chest.  I can leave out enough details in order to protect confidentiality.

Outing A Blogger

A tiff between an NRO blogger and a pseudonymous rival got ugly over the weekend.

Saw this over at The Volokh Conspiracy:

Over the past two months, Ed Whelan (with whom I blog on NRO’s “Bench Memos”) and a pseudonymous blogger at Obsidian Wings known as “publius,” have traded barbs and insults while debating various issues related to President Obama’s nominations of Harold Koh and Sonia Sotomayor. As a rhetorical matter, neither side proceeded with kid gloves. As a substantive matter, I believe Whelan got the better of publius more often than not, particularly with regard to Koh’s legal views. This weekend, however, I think Whelan crossed the line.

Over time, the heat-to-light ratio in the Whelan-publius exchanges increased, and Whelan learned publius’ real identity – a recently minted, untenured law professor. As part of a recent response to publius, Whelan decided to disclose this information in a blog post. This was wrong. While Whelan defends his course, I think it was an intemperate and unjustified response Granted publius attacked Whelan in harsh terms, often allowing the force of his rhetoric to outstrip the substance of his argument, but Whelan gave as good as he got, and exposing publius served no meaningful purpose.

In my view – and I’m hardly a disinterested party given my own history – pseudonymous blogging can enrich the academic and policy blogosphere. While it enables some to hurl reckless charges and gross epithets, it also facilitates the engagement of more individuals in on-line discussion and debate. There are many understandable reasons why intelligent and knowledgeable people in various fields are reluctant to blog under their own name. Adopting a pseudonym is not necessarily a cowardly or sinister act.

Read the linked article; there are lots and lots of links to source articles and related commentary.

I wondered what people thought about this topic - both pseudonyms and outing.

richtaylor is obviously comfortable posting under his real name. My handle isn’t a pseudonym as much as ‘dwex’ is simply the online handle I’ve had since 1981 (when 8 characters was the longest you could have, and everyone abbreviated), and I’m pretty easy to ferret out by anyone interested. I expect that kevinmr’s story is similar to mine.

Conversely, Manwhore, Thrill and zoomzoom are fully hidden behind their pseudonyms in this corner of the blogosphere, for whatever reasons they chose back when they started getting involved in this space.

We have people in our community on both sides of this fence. Anyone have any insights into one side or the other?

And what do people think about outing? Personally, I think that’s over the line, and I’d be sorely tempted to edit anything someone posted here that outed another member of the community. Any other opinions one way or the other?

Disorganized Labor

An epic showdown between the VO and SEWU

I saw a Craiglist ad on Friday that got me more than a little annoyed.  It’s since been flagged/deleted, but what it did was call on all security guards—banks, stores, armored cars, etc—to call off work on June 15 in order to show solidarity and eventually bully businesses into higher wages and benefits that they simply cannot afford.  I shot the poster an email in which I suggested that he take it “back to Jersey and keep it”.

Remarkably, he responded and we had a spirited back and forth over the weekend.  I’m not sure, but I think this is the guy:

To his credit, he lever lost his temper, despite my provocations.  What he did do was a lot of the same sort of left-wing filibustering I’ve heard so many times before:

We understand in your management position you have been engaged in the exportation of our security workers merely to generate the most profit for your company.

Your position that officers will not call in sick one day just to get the message across to the companies and clients that change is coming, is an ignorant position!  If you honestly believe that officers won’t take JUNE 15, 2009 as their day of message…, you must have also been one of the United States citizens that believed that the U.S. would never have a Black President!!!

Security Enforcement Workers Union

Just for the record, I never “exported” anyone.  Imported, maybe; exported, never!  Well, I came back with this:

And Take Your Wives With You!

The gay activist community displays their chivalry, and goes after those least likely to fight back

Bullying 101 dictates that when selecting a target, pick either the little guy or the pacifist, its safer that way. Taking the lessons to heart , gay activists have displayed their weenie-hood for everyone.

Last week in a Denver suburb, someone lit a Book of Mormon on fire and dropped it on the doorstep of a Mormon temple, presumably as a statement about the church’s support of Proposition 8 in California, an initiative that amended the state constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. In a move that may make gay-rights supporters’ heads spin, the incident is being investigated as a hate crime.

The outbreak of attacks on the Mormon church since the passage of Proposition 8 has been chilling: envelopes full of suspicious white powder were sent to church headquarters in Salt Lake City; protesters showed up en masse to intimidate Mormon small-business owners who supported the measure; a website was created to identify and shame members of the church who backed it; activists are targeting the relatives of prominent Mormons who gave money to pass it, as well as other Mormons who are only tangentially associated with the cause; some have even called for a boycott of the entire state of Utah.

The wisdom of hate-crimes legislation aside, there is no doubt that a lot of hate is being directed at Mormons as a group. But why single out Mormons? And why now?

Well, for the obvious reason that Mormons will not fight back, will not retaliate in any way, will not sue the instigators and most likely will not even press charges. They are being attacked because they are good people, not hateful or vindictive and not even anti gay but because they will grin and bear it, what a perfect victim.

The Mormons embrace a peculiar ideology is this regard.

Same-sex marriage hits at the heart of Mormon theology, said Terryl Givens, a professor of literature and religion at the University of Richmond. According to scholars and documents on the Mormon Church’s official Web site, couples married in a Mormon temple remain wedded for eternity and can give birth to spirit children in the afterlife. Most importantly, Mormons must be married to achieve “exaltation,” the ultimate state in the afterlife. Mormons also believe they retain their gender in the afterlife.

Whether you agree, don’t agree, think its silly or even asinine, this is their religious tenet, it works for them and it does not infringe on anybody’s freedoms. So The Church took an official stand ( much like the Catholic Church in their positions on abortion, birth control, stem cell research, etc.)

But many other groups or factions voted for the amendments as well. Most fundamentalist Christians supported it, as well as 70%  of the black vote, the Mormon Church could not have carried this measure all by themselves, yet they are the once being targeted.

To date, 30 states have voted on initiatives addressing same-sex marriage, and in every state traditional marriage has come out on top. But somehow the fact that Mormons got involved during the latest statewide referendum constitutes a bridge too far? In truth, Mormons are a target of convenience in the opening salvo of what is sure to be a full-scale assault on much of America’s religious infrastructure, which gay activists perceive as a barrier to their aspirations. Among religious groups, Mormons are not the biggest obstacle to same-sex marriage - not by a long shot. But they are an easy target. Anti-Mormon bigotry is unfortunately common, and gay-rights activists are cynically exploiting that fact.

Seems to me that if they are looking for a target, somebody really deserving and actually hateful, why not target the Fred Phelps nutjobs? or the Muslim community, those that adhere to an ideology where gays are deserving of stoning. Could it be that Fred Phelps has lawyers that will sue back, or Muslims don’t take kindly to those questioning their faith and are prone to Fatwa’s?

Now if the Mormons violated any campaign laws then by all means, lets look into it.

And yes, prop. 8 gets yet another day in court, although with a governor and attorney general for square in the camp of defeating the initiative, and the same state supreme court that already derailed the “will of the people” the first time, here we go again.

No doubt the Mormons wish this whole thing would get settled, this “turning the other cheek” thing is getting down right dangerous.

RNC Chairman Mike Duncan Must Resign

It’s time for a good old-fashioned purging

Following through on my call to action on my previous post, I have sent RNC Chairman Mike Duncan an email.  Here is the complete text:

Speaking as a lifelong Republican, I’m astounded at the spectacle of what happened to our Party at the polls yesterday.  Despite the fact that the Obama campaign was able to successfully tie President Bush’s low poll numbers to Senator McCain, the RNC utterly failed to nationalize the Congressional races by capitalizing on the American people’s even lower opinion of the 110th Congress.

The Republican Party is weaker and the nation is worse off for this performance under your leadership.  Although I do not wish to be seen as disparaging your long service to our Party, I believe that there must be accountability for this electoral disaster, and therefore, I strongly encourage you to step down as Chairman in favor of someone who can effectively reunite and reinvigorate the Republican Party. 

It’s time for a shakeup and the RNC will receive no donations or volunteer assistance from me until there is a dramatic improvement in organization.  Take responsibility for this, sir.

Cordially,

XXXXXX XXXXXX
Kansas City

I’ll let you know if I get a response (doubtful).  Feel free to add your own emails.  My next target will be the Congressional Republican leadership.

UPDATE: “You know, in certain older…civilized cultures, when men failed as entirely as you have; they would throw themselves on their swords.”

Just in case anyone thinks I’m being too harsh on this guy, just look at the blue states on the Electoral College map on any news site.  Florida?  Virginia?  Indi-fucking-ana?  If I screwed up that badly at my job, I’d be taken outside and blown up with a stick of dynamite up my ass in front of God, my subordinates, and clients.

Sometimes It’s Just Too Easy

My latest fun with Facebook statuses…

So one of my friends had this in his Facebook status:

I’ve voted for Obama in TwitVote—http://twitvote.twitmarks.com/.

To which I added the comment:

twitvote for Obama. Yeah, that sounds about right.

They sets ‘em up, I knocks ‘em down…

 

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Members

Share This Page

Recent Comments

From: The VO's Quick And Dirty Prognosticators
(@04:37AM 09/03/10)
Thrill: Just game day.  Too bad I’m not a big sports fan!  I’m just doing it for the extra cash.

From: The VO's Quick And Dirty Prognosticators
(@08:26PM 09/02/10)
section8: Oh nice. Do you get to work on game day or is it just back office stuff? Even though they piss me off that would…

From: The VO's Quick And Dirty Prognosticators
(@12:58PM 09/02/10)
Thrill: It’s funny you mention that.  I am actually going to be doing some part-time work at Arrowhead this season (nothing glorious).  Maybe I’ll use my…

From: Pigskin Saturday
(@08:57AM 09/02/10)
fingerbang: BCS: Florida (Champs) vs. Nebraska. Florida is better this year. Teams won’t be able to load up on Tebow and Florida will play more complete…

From: The VO's Quick And Dirty Prognosticators
(@08:35AM 09/02/10)
section8: KC Chiefs will have yet another shitty season, but then again one only needs to have the talent of a pulse to predict that one.…

Last 30 Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll

Syndicate

Search


Advanced Search

Translate This Page

Categories

Archives

Site Info

Total Entries: 2567
Total Comments: 17348
Total Trackbacks: 1
Most Recent Entry:
  09/03/2010 11:31 am
Most Recent Comment on:
   09/03/2010 04:37 am
Total Members: 92
Total Logged in members: 2
Total guests: 17
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on:
  09/03/2010 12:24 pm
The most visitors ever was 321 on:
  10/22/2008 07:03 am

View more stats at: statcounter.com